Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - abit

Pages: 1 ... 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 [222] 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 ... 309
3316
Meta / Why no [new] icon on the main boards?
« on: January 13, 2016, 10:13:57 pm »
On the main page, I can see the [new] icon beside name of a sub-forum if there are new posts, for example "Witnesses", but no [new] icon on the main boards, for example "BitShares 2.0" or "General Discussion". Why?

3317
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Witness triox-delegate atonement
« on: January 13, 2016, 10:09:03 pm »
I did receive the notification email sent by the forum.
Make sure you subscribed to this thread https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=19040.new;topicseen#new

3318
Technical Support / Re: Help!! I need to gain access to my wallet
« on: January 13, 2016, 10:04:36 pm »
What's the file name of your backup? I wonder it is a backup of BTS 0.x wallet or PTS wallet.

3319
Technical Support / Re: Worker Proposal: Collateralized Bond Market?
« on: January 13, 2016, 06:08:34 pm »
It depends on how soon we will get enough fund for supporting the development of this feature.
Are you willing to fund it?

3320
Good. For local shops, how can I know if they use Odoo or not? Just asking, I'm not good at passing those to shops at all.

3321
General Discussion / Re: Cryptofresh Block Explorer + MUSE now available
« on: January 13, 2016, 05:36:16 pm »
The rich list is awesome  +5%
Can you add a "total value" column to the rich list?
Can you format the numbers in rich list to same number of decimal places?

Glad you're finding it useful! Would the total value include debt, or would debt be subtracted from total value? Regarding formatting: I've added rounding for readability, with the option to turn it off to get precise values. Does that help?
Imo total = balance + collateral + order - debt, does it make sense?

The rounding is helpful, thank you. But I mean the list for example http://cryptofresh.com/a/OPENBTC, balance of the first holder is 58, but the second is 0.895, the third is 2, you get it? Better if show them as 58.000, 0.895, 2.000 and right aligned so looks more beautiful.

3322
General Discussion / Re: Mastering Approval Voting
« on: January 13, 2016, 05:31:38 pm »
Tiered threshold makes sense for me. However we need to define the tiers in detail, and identify which feature is on which tier, it's a bit hard imo.

3323
@Akado Imo it's better if you can talk to ccedk and metaexchange and blocktrades directly if you have chance , with some prepared information and questions (perhaps Stan has already tried but it doesn't matter). Perhaps they haven't much time to spend on the forum, so missed the discussion or unable to get the essentials of the discussion.

Thank you.

3324
General Discussion / Re: Mastering Approval Voting
« on: January 13, 2016, 05:11:16 pm »
I wrote a quick BSIP-draft for this:
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/4

Input appreciated
Thank you.
Have you created a worker for this BSIP? I'll approve it asap.

By the way, why not use a push request instead of an issue?

3325
General Discussion / Re: snapshots from Shanghai blockchain hackathon
« on: January 13, 2016, 04:59:46 pm »
Very positive info. Thanks!

3326
I think OPENASSETS have a chance. Obviously every exchange decides what it's best for their business model. But from a user pov shared orderbooks could be very interesting. If we at some point get bigger I'm sure we could get smaller exchanges to use them.
So why haven't blocktrades and metaexchange join OPENASSETS? They are competing for the first bite. I think it's best if we start with this, try to let them be combined as soon as possible.

Thank you very much Akado. It's very interesting and helpful to discuss with you.

3327
So a combination of bond market and multi-sig asset issuer is perfect. A group of big entities issue assets, in the meanwhile they can lend assets to smaller entities to earn some profits. Is there something missing?

3328
For a shared order book, we need a same asset for all the exchanges. Obviously like OPENBTC which is issued by a single entity won't be accepted by other exchanges. But BitBTC which need 2x+ collateral won't be adopted as well if the exchanges need to put in the collateral. We need an asset with around 100% or less collateral so the exchanges can sustain.

One solution could be the bond market. Others will put in the collateral for you! You just need to pay for a market decided interest.

Another solution could be an asset owned by a multi-sig account, on which every exchanges have some weight of control, just like the Federal Reserve System. It's not collateral related anyway. With this, exchanges are able to issue the same asset on demand, and they'll find a balance among themselves.

//Edit:
One asset is not enough, we need a list of assets, so that they can be traded against each other. Side chain is not the answer, since it's impossible for fiat.

3329
@Akado I hereby very appreciate your efforts. You've learned much and knew the strong point and weak point of our solution. You indicated how can we get stronger. What's your bts account? I'd like to donate a few.

@Stan thanks for drawn another huge pie for us.

3330
General Discussion / Re: exchange preparing for voting
« on: January 13, 2016, 03:28:07 pm »
That's too complicated for a common Joe. Thus not a good idea for voting. Voting should be simple to understand.

Pages: 1 ... 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 [222] 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 ... 309