The rich list is awesome 
Can you add a "total value" column to the rich list?
Can you format the numbers in rich list to same number of decimal places?

Earlier or later we'll have to face this. Imo it's better earlier than later.

Rather than complaining, I'd like to think more on how to prevent the top N worst scenarios from happening.
Improve the rules from the code, not from asking someone to do something or not to do something.

What are the worst scenarios?
* A whale votes badly (perhaps by accidentally)
* A whale's account is compromised, votes badly
* A whale distribute her stake among several accounts, votes badly
* A group of whales vote badly
* A whale lend her stake to someone else, asked for no change of votes, but the borrower changed the votes, badly.
* A "bad" witness or a group of "bad" witnesses is/are voted in

How to prevent them? Some ideas here, but may be wrong.
* One stake can only vote for one committee member
* Any witness with votes higher than 10% of total stake supply are considered "voted in" (in addition need to think what will happen if too many are voted in and how to deal with it)
* When voting, one must vote for at least 5 witnesses, no more than 100 witnesses, otherwise the vote is considered invalid.
* When voting, desired_witness_number = size_of(the voted list of witnesses)*2+1, or say, if you vote for 10 witnesses, you agree that you want there are 21 witnesses in total
* standby witnesses should be allowed to produce blocks in some cases, for example some "active" witnesses are detected offline, a detected offline witness must prove that it's online so that it's permitted to produce block again.

It's too bad that we lost two witnesses in the process.

It means our remaining active witnesses have to work harder.

If you claimed your funds to an old account (created before 2.0), your funds are safe. Just create a new wallet, and import your keys again.

If you claimed your funds to a new account (created after 2.0), your fund would be lost.

Wish you happy. 
Nathan and James Calfee not here?
Who is Ned?

Good analysis.
I remember BM ever said there are some technical challenges to be resolved before it can be implemented.

Another issue by now: we need developers, we need fund to support developers.

净土说的没错，拉人头快，留人头难。
为什么说一定要把手续费战略性暂时性调低？就是先有鸡还是先吃鸡蛋的问题。
把手续费调低，吸引做市机器人进来，然后拉的人头可以高频交易，必需要投机客进来，甚至说不好听，能拉来传销客最好。

其实做市不需要多少手续费。现在10BTS下单费，如果撤单，全额返还。终身会员还打2折。一天平均下来，可能比BTS0.9时的0.1BTS每次下单撤单成本还低。

我们是做什么的？我们是做工具的，管特么谁拿来干什么，关键要让全世界人知道我们的工具很牛逼，很多人用。只要上了规模，形成了使用习惯，有了用户群，立牌坊还是当婊子都特么随便。
BM他们根本没有任何，哪怕是一点点，一丁点的商业运营头脑，也难怪特么穷死没钱开发了。
CCEDK费了很大的心血，可能是创始人在小国家的原因，不理解什么是互联网思维，不知道什么叫用户群，不知道什么叫规模效应，可能他们的脑子里，一万个用户就在他们国家牛逼成球了。放长线钓大鱼的道理他们永远不懂。

唉，那现在我们能干什么？只能砸盘走人？
要么，你来运营看看？要多少资源支持，人、资金？

Good move.

for best performance better to use chrome .. safari and firefox aren't recommended currently ..

When trying to open Exchange with safari it stucks for me on loading screen directly ..

Safari Version 8.0.8 (10600.8.9)
Yosemite 10.10

Thanks for your input anyway..
Unfortunately, if they can't create backup in Safari, how to import/migrate to Chrome safely?