Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Digital Lucifer

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1
Would that require additional switch on UIA/Token management/creation ? e.g. "Allow borrow", "Set interest %", etc...

On the legal side, it would allow users/gateways to actually provide service of "Money Lending", which is without proper licencing not allowed in most countries of the world.
- Who would be taking responsibility ? Blockchain ? *(if not ignore next question)* If does, how blockchain earns from UIA as part of the process ?

Or it would be done on core level, and instead of UIA we will re-issue BTC, ETH, and others as new form of half smart-assets half UIA assets ?



Apologies if my questions not have much sense, I'm trying to clarify it for myself.

Chee®s

2
Why pay for SSL certs when you can get them for free using certbot?

I'm not sure of the neccessity of the newsletter, email nor professional inquiry panel, these feel like centralizing BTS around this website.

1) Paid SSL at inbound price of 10ish Dollar per certificate for a year with signature of the domain on it is not same security as free ssl certbot.

2) Newsletter is common in any normal business in the world. Its being used for signups and monthly notifications to its clients/partners.

Everything but "centralizing" is included in this worker.

Many thanks for your opinion and support. 

3
Stakeholder Proposals / [Worker Proposal] BitShares.org - ID: 1.14.126
« on: October 10, 2018, 02:11:02 pm »
Dear BitShares,

After long awaited new website and proper management through Consensus and by asking for support of BitShares rightful proxies, stake-holders and wider community, finally here we are with finalized and approved worker by escrow partner (BBF) brought to You on voting and discussion!

https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2018-10-bitshares-org

Please give it a CAREFUL READ and feel FREE TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS you might have.

Cheers,

Milos (DL).




4
Hey there :)

Suggestion for white background and color palette of the logo (as on image below) would be too much ? It would be cool to follow the trend with upcoming website :D



I'm 100% supporting and buzzing you in TG for extra stickers!


Thanks for all the efforts!

5
Supported by vote on behalf of Trusty and myself.

6
Will this work alongside current documentation uplift efforts? https://t.me/joinchat/AWRo40N1sGr9SNGo_pv3KA
The idea is to utilize the available resources there and merely guide the documentation efforts
to fit into the lessons learned (most compliance) ... We'd also like to find a solution to have a
community member deal with the project management and have everyone benefit from their
work. Consider the whole worker proposal a "bounty program" that is lead by Blockchain Projects BV
(as a legal entity to take the lead and responsibility) and put forth by the community under guidance.

Is there any updates on this Worker? As I understood it, the goal of this worker is to update the current online documentation.

So far, there hasn't been any updates to this since March in this thread, and the accounting page on bitshares.foundation, https://workers.bitshares.foundation/201802-documentation, mentions no invoice.

Does this worker post updates elsewhere, does it have a goal/roadmap on what is required to be done before the end and does it allow easy access for community submissions to its goal?

I believe that it was up to the Community and rest of the eco-system to step-up and claim Bounty on making the proper documentation. Far as initial expectations from this worker I see new WhitePaper done and a lot of Compliance in it.

https://dev.bitshares.works
https://how.bitshares.works
https://www.bitshares.foundation/papers/BitSharesBlockchain.pdf

Chee®s

7
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BSIP22
« on: October 01, 2018, 05:10:17 am »
Its not that simple and it needs to be expanded/more specific. Please check my comment on multi-level proxies, its kinda related. And its important to understand both sides of the medal

https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/79#issuecomment-418610701

Btw, after I've done some more detailed research, 'down-voting' would bring more war rather than balance and peace, so ignore that part.

8
Update:

Thanks to everyone + special thanks to whoever was yesterday deciding vote on worker to gets voted in.

We are creating today on github repository and team will start work/logging hours no more late than this Friday. Commits will be available only to the BitShares github team until admin decide/review what is for public release.

@abit

Pinged you on telegram - re Github Repository, Fabian is away, please check when you can.

How are things coming along? We were discussing this WP at the bitfest event last week, looking forwards to the developments.  :)
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-community-ui
https://github.com/bitshares/vuex-bitshares

Many thanks Abit! :)

Things are going very well for first 2 weeks of actual work. Getting proper traction and management of tasks/issues/hours. Actually, hese 2 weeks (hours against issues) - reports are coming up tomorrow on Github and i'll post direct links here with legend to it :D

Cheers

9
General Discussion / Re: 【 Witness Report for for-one 】
« on: September 16, 2018, 04:08:21 am »
Duplicate https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26982.0;topicseen

Maybe i was harsh in the original reply/post, but i was definitely not wrong...

Fav, Clockwork, whoever has privilege - lock and move please.

10
Update:

Thanks to everyone + special thanks to whoever was yesterday deciding vote on worker to gets voted in.

We are creating today on github repository and team will start work/logging hours no more late than this Friday. Commits will be available only to the BitShares github team until admin decide/review what is for public release.

@abit

Pinged you on telegram - re Github Repository, Fabian is away, please check when you can.


11
Infrastructure update 11.09.2018

- Nodes has been added to wallet.bitshares.org (by pull request on github in develop branch)

check compare https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/compare/develop...dls-cipher:patch-1?diff=split

Pull request is here: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/pull/1844

- Currently there is 21 provisioned node. Here is the full list:

1. status200.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
2. new-york.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
3. australia.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
4. dallas.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
5. chicago.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
6. atlanta.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
7. us-la.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
8. japan.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
9. france.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
10. england.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
11. holland.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
12. miami.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
13. valley.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
14. seattle.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
15. bitshares.nu - OK - Premium SSL
17. api.open-asset.tech - OK - SSL to be deployed
18. canada6.daostreet.com - OK - Premium SSL
19. paris7.daostreet.com - OK - Premium SSL - DNS Propagating
20. frankfurt8.daostreet.com - OK - Premium SSL
21. testnet.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL

LEGEND:
GREEN - 100% operational
ORANGE - up to 24 hours issue
RED - up to 72 hours issue

- Structure

Currently status200 is biggest node with largest bandwidth included in the package. We are using that node with automatic backup script to stop one time a week, provide fresh backup of 'witness_node' software with fully synced blockchain and using simple .sh scripts are provisioning that node to all others.

Scripts can be inspected here https://github.com/dls-cipher/pre-compiled-witness_node
(its pretty lame and dirty bash scripting with plans to be polished, even more interactive as setup in shell)

Status can be checked for currently running nodes within our website https://status.apasia.tech

There is more than 21 listed on status page, since we are adding them as we provision them, to keep better track of hours towards invoicing.

All trackers are reseted and starting from today.

- Overview

1. We had to turn OFF most of the daostreet nodes in order to cut cost with AWS of 1800-2000$ a month for just 9 VPS instances.
2. For any questions please reply here or find me in telegram @murda_ra

- Escrow partner is invoiced for 1-time setup (reimbursement fees), while on-going invoices (cost of the nodes) will be delivered by 20. September.


NOTICE: If dallas/testnet node shows strange behavior please report it asap. Those 2 are sitting on one instance currently running multi websocket with multi-domain nginx configuration.


Cheers.

12
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BSIP 40: Custom active permissions
« on: August 30, 2018, 12:08:30 am »
On behalf of Trusty, few others and myself and humble weight that steem-not has - Voted.

Looking forward playing with custom permissions in reality :D

13
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Witness Report for for-one
« on: August 29, 2018, 01:47:15 am »
No need for check, I was not wrong - But was not expecting zb.com

So, bts account yang2017 created a lot of accounts since June until now including for-one. Earlier Kimchi-King commented on Twitter on zbbts001 account as new Chinese exchange without website or nobody knows anything about.

Yang2017 who came creating all of the accounts created the main accounts who are in Active threshold of the zbbts001 (who currently has 65M BTS in wallet).


Active
zhou001   33   19.88%
tan001   33   19.88%
xu001   33   19.88%
ybts01   33   19.88%
hua01   33   19.88%
BTS8DZZ2xUvf7QV8VndBdvuTG1EPdmSDJBaPFP7TEeePy4DuvzKzt   1   0.6%
Threshold   51   30.7%


http://cryptofresh.com/u/zbbts001 - exchange account

http://cryptofresh.com/u/yang2017

http://cryptofresh.com/u/for-one


So, you have very nice stack there, very nice private business, 800k BTS Volume in trading and very nice VIP programs https://vip.zb.com/vote/rules

I don't see you doing anything good for BitShares Blockchain actually, apart for yourself only.

Not to mention that you have "your own blockchain"

https://vip.zb.com/activity/zbecology

And example of a shitshow here in forums regarding zb.com who is apparently very hard to be contacted even by their own users.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25494.msg313498#msg313498



Many thanks for the attempt and appreciate towards all the hard work you've done for the blockchain.

As far as im concerned, based on the way you did approach and what i can dig about you - We are not currently accepting new BPs ;)

But my stake means nothing, so it's actually up to the real stake-holders and proxies. Hopefully my report above will be more useful than for-one's introduction.

Reminder: Keep comments in English.

Many thanks.

14
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Witness Report for for-one
« on: August 29, 2018, 12:49:27 am »
Can Fav/Clockwork checkout at least IP of the author is it matching with someone else ? This seems as a dodgy attempt of existing business around to setup puppet account.

I just can't believe that someone who done so much research and development/business around BitShares, or even just read 3 last witness proposals, is not aware that Testnet Witness is first step of becoming Witness.

Maybe I'm wrong.

15
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Bitshares UI Renewal
« on: August 16, 2018, 06:58:51 am »
Probably referring to e.g.

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1529

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1570

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1634

The insult happened, could not find it now. It was more than simple discussion though.

You cant find it because worker manager/repository manager can delete, hide or even alter/edit comments.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8