What about giving this blocktrades's idea a chance?

We did try several things in the last months/years, I think we can afford another experiment, moreover if this experiment tries to rely more on our decentralized exchange.

I understand that there are some reservations and concerns, but I think we can try to apply some stratagem to remedy or at least to limit the possibility of negative outcomes.

For instance, we could try this new approach once the market making contest is started.
Thanks to the market making contest, we hope to have:

• Multiple reliable gateways with active deposit and withdrawal
• These gateways should gain more trust since they will provide evidence about their assets being fully-backed
• More liquidity/volume in specific inner markets

We could derive our bitassets prices from these same inner markets (directly or indirectly) that hopefully will see an increase in liquidity: such as BTS/BTC, BTS/ETH, and BTS/USDT
To avoid some bad feedback-loop and/or our inner markets being crashed due to higher pressure from cex's bts markets, we can still apply some trick that we already use.

We could feed:

Code: [Select]

max(price-from-inner-markets, price-from-cex)
or, in line with the latest proposal from cn-vote group:

Code: [Select]

max(price-from-inner-markets, moving-average-price-from-cex)
Thoughts?

max(price-from-inner-markets, price-from-cex)
max(price-from-inner-markets, moving-average-price-from-cex)

After forced vacation from this forum, I am finally back!

现在理事会就已经执行喂价人和见证人分离了么？竟然不要bisp投票的么？有必要这么快么？具体的方案通过没有？这个喂价又不是小孩过家家，改不好就是要命的事。我不知道有什么好处值得这么冒险？以后理事会就有权利确定喂价和喂价人了？如何监管？喂价人作恶怎么办？有的提案要投票，这么重要的提案又不要投票，我们小散表示真的搞不懂。一直在懵逼状态。这么改到底什么目的？

必须要有明确的方案，充分研究有无漏洞，再投票通过，才能执行。这样谁报名就给谁喂价权利， 开玩笑吧？

不要浪费时间在BSIP83了，都没有理事会，见证人，大代理人支持和大力推动的。

Sapiens has a point. Bsip76 is effectively taking a Globally Traded and long term marketed as stable asset and creating an artificial difference in its price, and that is being done in order to benefit a specific group of people.

Out of the top of my head I can think of at least 5 different reasons why this can make for a legal investigation. I mean, think what would happen if Tether all of a sudden decided to devalue its coin by 10 or 20%!!!

Also, the regular protocol was violated when changing the price-feed and several claims of witnesses being forced to adjust the price-feed or to vote the Bsip have been ignored.

One thing that must be understood is that whatever change is done in the Bitshares protocol will have a small yet global effect already. Whoever proposes or implements something here, is dealing not only with his money, but also with someone else's. This is no children's game.

Finally, whoever doesn't want to be treated as a criminal, shouldn't act as one.

Well, The only one left crying will be you and your perverted logic once FBI, Interpol or your harsh communist authorities find out what you and your gang have been coercing other witnesses to do.

I don't see how this is not financial  criminal activity. Recently G7 pronounced against stable coins. They called them a threat to global financial system. What will authorities do once they find out that an asset, long time marketed as stable, had its price feed faked by voting power created out of thin air and extortion to key role players in a decentralized community?

https://www.coinstaker.com/the-g7-global-stablecoins/

Enjoy the news you idiot.