Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ebit

Pages: 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125
1741
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 今天是哪个神人?
« on: April 20, 2014, 10:15:37 pm »
只睡了三个小时就忍耐不住打开电脑了。 :)
果然看到的是好消息。
谢谢大家,谢谢3i社区,谢谢Stan 和 Bytemaster及所有3i管理层.
大家能宽容我的错误,实在让我倍感幸运。
加密货币是高风险的,但社区是友爱的。
需要我做什么,我一万个乐意。

1742
谢谢大家,谢谢3i社区,谢谢Stan 和 Bytemaster及所有3i管理层.
大家能宽容我的错误,实在让我倍感幸运。
加密货币是高风险的,但社区是友爱的。
需要我做什么,我一万个乐意。

1743
BitShares AGS / Re: Today .I made a too bad mistake
« on: April 20, 2014, 10:00:02 pm »
Calculate the average AGS per PTS for the past 10 days.
Calculate how many PTS would have to be returned to everyone today such that they effectively paid the same AGS per PTS.
Produce the list of addresses and balances so I can copy /paste it.
Identify a proposed compensation to us and the fellow donors for correcting this mistake.   

This will make sure that the entire community receives a fair outcome.  ebit will still have given more than he intended to, but no one else will have gotten a RAW deal and all ebit effectively loses is a bit of liquidity.

Thanks.I trust you.You are my hero.Finally I will have a good sleep.  :)

1744
BitShares AGS / Today .I made a too bad mistake
« on: April 20, 2014, 04:09:20 pm »
Then I was waching movie, and i found ags was suit to donate.
So I will donate 9.99 to ags.
But I donated 9.99 to me ,and the rest of pts were donated to ags.

I was sorry to friends who donated today . Very sorry.

日期: 2014-4-20 21:24
到: PaNGEL PaNGELmZgzRQCKeEKM6ifgTqNkC4ceiAWw
支出: -6120.00 PTS
交易费: -0.01 PTS
净额: -6120.01 PTS
交易ID: 741a26b31a65d6b4e54bddbf0e5d456b147d94d63ded6895a6274d4dc4dc0186

1745
DAC PLAY / Re: Blockchain RNG with DPOS
« on: April 20, 2014, 03:38:34 pm »
@HackFisher
I give you a PM

Yes, ebit, I understand you, and just waited and checked the http://www1.agsexplorer.com/. It seems that it did happened.

You know that like BTC, this transaction are recorded on the blockchain, and no one has the power to change it technically. And as it's being part of contract and being a special case with large amount PTS, I think ans suggest you might need help from the community and AGS foundation. I can not respond to your PM now.

Thanks very much.

1746
DAC PLAY / Re: Blockchain RNG with DPOS
« on: April 20, 2014, 03:19:20 pm »
@HackFisher
I give you a PM

1747
好片,动画表达的很清晰,令人印象深刻。这种债务上限游戏没几年玩头了。

1748
中文 (Chinese) / Re: keyhotee等大数据量DAC的存储方案探讨
« on: April 18, 2014, 09:26:03 am »
做这样的一个请客户端也是有意义的,可以尝试。

1749
中文 (Chinese) / Re: BTX界面开发[4.17更新]
« on: April 18, 2014, 09:08:48 am »
顶,开发力量向中国转移吧。

1750
所以我感觉maidsafe的coin收藏价值大于流通价值

对,收藏价值大。看比特币价格增长曲线战胜不了算力曲线就知道,coin本身的使用价值是有保证的。价格就不好说了,毕竟比特币流通性最好。

1751
有点跑题了。但也有点收获。比特币,作为一个点对点的电子现金系统。其价格是市场决定的。比特股呢?他将市场引入了点对点系统,并在运营过程中让代表即出力还展开博弈竞争,并在更广范围内让所有持有人有多种行为选择权。所以,比特股是一个,点对点的电子市场系统。

比特币阵营是通过blockchain创新;MaidSafe是通过虚拟化进行创新。技术上应该可以互相借鉴。

1752
coin就是个衡量指标。这个指标可以是不可转让的贡献值。但,将贡献值和coin两者相比较,如果给共享了硬盘,你喜欢要哪一个当奖励?coin是历史趋势。贡献值可以理解为常量,等多的是衡量过去。coin是个比例数值,既可以方便的衡量过去也可以方便的衡量未来。贡献值,如果设计不合理,更趋向于贬值。因为你今天买的电脑是1t的硬盘,明年可能是100t的。即,你今天的贡献总比未来的要小。但,如果是比例数值,你今天拿到了亿分之一的coin,那你就可以终生享用亿分之一的权力。

贡献值就不能是比例值么?当然可以。如果还可以交易,那不就是coin了么?

1753
dpos终究是个里程碑。如果需要在应用层面体现出更深刻的去中心化而且还要满足复杂的交易模式,只能期待maidsafe ,从更底层的去中心化来实现了。

1754
开99个,谁来开,总得有个机制。

1755
可以参考白皮书。
ppc的pos解决了谁来产生下一个block.但不检查前一个block.
Tapos解决了检查前一个block。但没有解决谁产生下一个block.
Dpos都解决了。搞这么复杂就是为了保证系统安全有效的运行,产生比特资产。
基本上连有破坏动机和有破坏可能的代表都会被逐步淘汰。

Pages: 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125