Show Posts
181
General Discussion / Re: The second collateral is an open idea .
« on: May 25, 2018, 01:47:42 pm »
二类抵押物的用途局限在 延迟爆仓 的担保物。我们不适用二类抵押物生产 bitcny，只有抵押者要爆仓了，才可以给他这个选择权：可以拿持仓的gdex.btc按均价做二次担保。从而不立即把他的爆仓单甩向市场。
现有系统把抵押的bts甩向市场的目的，是为了保证bitcny的购买力不贬值。而事实是，bitcny正在升值，而且越甩卖越升值，内盘的bts都低于喂价了。abit调节MCR可以减轻甩卖，二类抵押物也是这个目的。而且二类抵押作为补充，并不伤害“保证bitcny的购买力不贬值”这一宪法。
The second collateral is not used to create bitcny ,its mission is a certificate.
When I will be settlement.
If gdex.btc as the second collateral,I can down my call price with it.
Otherwise before that i must sell gdex.btc for settlement.
Asset sell wall is a double hurt for BitshareS system,when BTS was dumped.
现有系统把抵押的bts甩向市场的目的，是为了保证bitcny的购买力不贬值。而事实是，bitcny正在升值，而且越甩卖越升值，内盘的bts都低于喂价了。abit调节MCR可以减轻甩卖，二类抵押物也是这个目的。而且二类抵押作为补充，并不伤害“保证bitcny的购买力不贬值”这一宪法。
The second collateral is not used to create bitcny ,its mission is a certificate.
When I will be settlement.
If gdex.btc as the second collateral,I can down my call price with it.
Otherwise before that i must sell gdex.btc for settlement.
Asset sell wall is a double hurt for BitshareS system,when BTS was dumped.
gdex.btc or open.btc is not based on the Bitshares's DEX core Assets，it based on the GDEX or OPEN gateway service.
I don't think it's suitable or good as the collateral.
BTS is not like the MakerDAO which can use ERC20 TOKENS as the collateral.
像这些网关资产都是半去中心的，我感觉作为锚定资产抵押物不是太合适，如果原子交换或者去中心化网关可以实现的话倒是可以一试。
而且多种抵押物的存在，可能出现的问题会更严重。
修正好现在的抵押及爆仓机制，再对相应规则进行调整，内盘的状况会比现在好很多。
将爆仓单的惩罚降至5%，同时对爆仓单收取5%的手续费加入公开市场操作资金，这样的话公开市场操作资金会提供相当大数量的锚定资产供应量。
