Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - btswolf

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 22
91
General Discussion / Re: COMPUMATRIX COMPUCEEDS investigation
« on: March 02, 2016, 09:09:52 am »
According to the motto... What I don't know won't hurt me.

If you don`t care what businesses use BitShares ok. But maybe other stakeholders do care because it can have an effect on their investment.
And as long as there is no witch there will be no witch-hunt, so calm down.

[member=21903]roadscape[/member] Do you know more about this project?

92
I hope we get a detailed analysis of what happened and how CCEDK will prevent future security breaches.
And I hope our bank account details and document copies from the FIAT Deposit page are more secure!
Your security is our security.
EDIT: Actually I don`t know why we need two threads under general to address this topic...

This is a situation like so many others, I will not let these people be the reason for me to have to explain how we deal with security, putting it all in their hands. We are not the first experiencing this kind, and we are not the last. We do all we can to secure best way possible. But really, this is solved and thats that. Lets focus on what really counts, speaking how to prevent somethng from happening is going to take us into next century, and not worth the time. What you can do is look if you can do things better and then do it, thats all everybody does.

It is put here as official info and could be put under CCEDK in fact.
I have no words for that statement, sorry.

93
General Discussion / what`s Compumatrix/COMPUCEEDS?
« on: March 01, 2016, 10:32:20 pm »
If someone can provide deeper knowledge about Compumatrix please share.
http://cryptofresh.com/a/COMPUCEEDS

Discuss if this is a legit project or something like a get rich quick scheme.
Since they didn`t approached the community yet we should start to investigate research to decide if it is something to promote or to stay away from.

94
I hope we get a detailed analysis of what happened and how CCEDK will prevent future security breaches.
And I hope our bank account details and document copies from the FIAT Deposit page are more secure!
Your security is our security.
EDIT: Actually I don`t know why we need two threads under general to address this topic...

96
General Discussion / Re: New scam targetting Open Ledger users!
« on: March 01, 2016, 08:30:43 pm »
I hope we get a detailed analysis of what happened and how CCEDK will prevent future security breaches.
And I hope our bank account details and document copies from the FIAT Deposit page are more secure!
Your security is our security.

97
Meta / Re: Remove Partners Sections from Home
« on: March 01, 2016, 06:14:12 am »
Please rename the Partners section to something like "Third Party Projects" and make it a main Sub under BitShares.

It is not reasonable to promote third party projects at a prominent place, especially if they are inactive, have slow progress or are just shady.
We still have those projects without any criteria one the front page at prominent place.
How many Third Party Projects do fit on the front page?
Make it a sub/child section or every blog including my should get listed at prominent place as third party project.

98
General Discussion / Re: Testing Stealth UI
« on: February 29, 2016, 08:19:56 pm »
As a user I would expect a single option when doing a transaction. Stealth On(expensive)/Off(cheap).
Everything else will be not finished in my little world.
But I`m not the sponsor.
(just thinking out loud)

99
Meta / Re: Remove Partners Sections from Home
« on: February 29, 2016, 07:28:06 pm »
So community has spoken. Who will execute the task?

100
are you still working on the remaining Whitepapers?

101
Meta / Re: Remove Partners Sections from Home
« on: February 28, 2016, 03:58:42 pm »
poll added

102
Meta / Remove Partners Sections from Home
« on: February 28, 2016, 01:51:38 pm »
Please rename the Partners section to something like "Third Party Projects" and make it a main Sub under BitShares.

It is not reasonable to promote third party projects at a prominent place, especially if they are inactive, have slow progress or are just shady.

103
OpenLedger / Re: ccedk, OpenLedger, Bitteaser, Daydream Consult ?
« on: February 21, 2016, 03:51:18 pm »
thanks for your openness.

104
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: why is cass worker thread locked?
« on: February 21, 2016, 11:45:56 am »
just curious because he said he would refund his worker income in his last post.

105
OpenLedger / ccedk, OpenLedger, Bitteaser, Daydream Consult ?
« on: February 21, 2016, 11:43:23 am »
[member=23432]ccedk[/member]

Would you mind to sched some light on your business infrastructure?
CCEDK is registered at:
Tyttebærvej 6, Hune, DK-9492 Blokhus Denmark
Bitteaser says on its investors page it is located at the same address and Daydream Consult too.

Who is behind Bitteaser? Who is admin and who is admin2?
Why is BitTeaser not a registered Company?
Who is Edward Reidhead aka. Edward Freeman and how are you related to him?
What is Daydream Consult?
Do you all live/work in the same $150k single-family 125 m² house with 4 rooms, one kitchen, one bathroom and two toilets?
Is this your house or are you guys just working there?
How many people are working permanently for CCEDK or are there only contract based workers?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 22