CN-Vote has only 250 million votes so blaming everything on them is wrong.BEOS is at least to be blamed the same making the deep corruption in committee even possible and blocking workers you claim to be important.
I will explain more in detail why i disagree tonight.

But one question.
Are Dev's going to fork everytime a new voting system when someone gets to powerfull they disagree with ?

making the deep corruption in committee even possible and blocking workers

But one question.
Are Dev's going to fork everytime a new voting system when someone gets to powerfull they disagree with ?

when someone gets to powerfull

Did Abit disagree with CN-Vote ?Am asking because he was always supportive to them and their actions,banning dev's who questioned some actions.
Was DL disagreeing with CN-Vote ?Cause i saw him claiming cn-vote to be wise and smart when getting his worker approved.
It seems he always blames chinese when his worker doesn't seem to get approved.

Has Abit and DL support of foreigners?
A clear no and majority of foreigners having anykind of influence on bitshares sees it as a hostile takeover

hostile takeover

You can also add that abit destroyed the main bitshares telegram channel by adding his bot and indirectly and directly banning people who
argued about his bad actions.He banned very active admins there who where nicely invested in BTS and made majority of people going silent there.Another part is now moving to digital lucifers chat where he is owner and these cheaters admins.

They are conditioning people there for their own agenda and doesn't allow any other opinion than theirs.


People myself included had been fighting abits one men show quite long.
He is definetly a good dev and very active however he should not be in committee because of his lack of ethics and economic understanding.His sole power in github already upset the old core team showing he thinks he have sole power over bitshares which haven't changed till today which is why cn-vote had to fork it.

锁定已经是既定事实，最有利的办法，是将0.22的最低喂价写进代码。


如果未来允许喂价低于0.22，bts的市值排名还会往下走。

bitcny严重脱描已是事实，
再解锁喂价意义不大了。

如果未来允许喂价低于0.22，bts的市值排名还会往下走。

一个抵押杠杆者不断从银行抵押借贷资金上杠杆，当抵押品价格一旦下跌，这些抵押者第一时间想到的不是马上还款来缓解银行及自己的债务危机，而是想办法如何让这个借贷系统瘫痪，因为这样才能符合他们最大的利益，而且一旦抵押者拥有了操控借贷系统的能力，这种想法会变得无比强烈并会立即付诸行动。

有些BTS元老莫要天天傻乎乎的讲抵押者是最关心BTS发展的，这种歪理怕是连你们自己也不信，什么？！连你自己都信了，真是可悲！一个赌客还会在于赌场的死活？赢得时候开开心心，输得时候怕不是要把赌场给掀了！

Quote from: binggo on August 07, 2020, 03:46:16 am

Quote from: bench on August 06, 2020, 09:59:02 pm

Quote from: binggo on August 02, 2020, 04:18:14 pm

至于流动性计划，我想社区bench的流动性提案与现在uniswap基本也有一些相通之处，未必不是一个好方案。

yes, this is similar to Uniswap, but what is wrong with Uniswap?

Nothing wrong with Uniswap

Good, I think it is relative simple and now you have also the option to take a long position, because you need only to stake one asset and not two, like in the old version.

公会见证人运行规则
2020年7月18日 pm3:00 • 资讯

目前公会见证人确定为ioex，今后视情况增加。活跃见证人一个月大概收入4万bts，ioex每月的服务器维护费用大概1200元，不算人工。
公会见证人规则如下：
一、每月ioex从收入中扣除3000元作为日常维护费和基本人工工资，以每月最后一天的bts价格折算，并从月收入中扣除。每月一号，ioex将剩余的bts打入公会积分帐号cn-admin，用于回购，并向公会公示。见证人收入，操作等都是透明，大家均可监督。
二、cn-admin每月15号之前完成对公会积分的回购，挂单价格、策略等由公会多签商议决定。完成回购后，既将本月回购公会积分总量的30％发还给ioex，做为奖金。
三、公会见证人若需更换升级机器等大项开支，向公会申请，经投票通过后，实报实销，从下个月收入中扣除。
四、公会见证人必须满足喂价质量和丢包率等合格标准。若经两次公会会议督促改进后还不合格，此公会见证人作废。