Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitcrab

Pages: 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
1066
[member=20744]cube[/member]:

This is not only to help myself, but also and especially to encourage other shorters.

I definitely cannot supply enough BitCNY,  we need more shorters to join the game.

1067
中文(Chinese) / 与收费狂魔战斗,你可以贡献你的力量!
« on: November 26, 2015, 03:00:37 pm »
标题仅供娱乐,请勿当真。 8)

社区对于降低仓位调整费没什么反对的声音,应该几天后会顺利实施:https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20265.0.html

我想降低这个收费,是因为我觉得供应MPA的人是在给社区做贡献,然后还要忍受这么高的费用是一件很让人蛋疼的事情。

如果你很想调整某些收费,请跟帖说明并写出你的理由,如果我觉得要求很合理也很实际,我会考虑提建议调整。
现在的收费结构见这里:http://cryptofresh.com/fees

一个最终能够顺利设施的费用调整建议通常要满足下面条件:
1.理由很明确,并且(至少看起来)对社区的作用是正向的。
2.照顾各方利益,能够最终达成妥协,不会引起社区分裂。


1068
What do we have committee proposals for again?
Votes in the forum are worthless for two reasons:
* every account as a vote
* every account has equal votes
That does NOT represent how the BitShares DAC is run ..

Instead of argumenting about individual fees .. I'd rather see someone do the task of a "Controller" and evaluate different pricing models with projections of how many customers may come in

This post is just to collect feedback from community, to ensure that there is no factors we haven't considered before creating a proposal.
I think to change the fees individuals is also OK, although it may be not the best,  just like " Pareto improvement ".
and I doubt whether a "Controller" model really work in a DAC. but anyone can try, he/she can try to build a pricing model with according fee structure, and finally the  votes will decide whether to adopt.

1069
should post in the public board, who can delete this?

1070
having seen suggestion to reduce more, and also to change the account_update fee, I feel the proposal need change, new proposal will be:

change both the call order update fee and account update fee to 1 BTS(for LTM to 0.2 BTS).

because:

1. neither of these fees is the core business fee.
2.we need to encourage shorters and also votes/proxy.
3.these operation cost few.

please revote.

below is the comment to the old poll, and when I changed the poll the result is: support:32 objection:1 neutral:1   

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I plan to create a proposal to change the call order update fee (margin position update fee) from 40 BTS to 5 BTS(for LTM  from 8 BTS to 1 BTS), please let me know your opinion to this change.

Why do this change?

1. As MPAs such as BitUSD and BitCNY are getting more widely used, we need to encourage shorters to supply more MPAs.
2. Cost for updating margin position is not high.

the poll is for the whole community and will last 5 days.

1071
I plan to create a proposal to change the call order update fee (margin position update fee) from 40 BTS to 5 BTS(for LTM  from 8 BTS to 1 BTS), please let me know your opinion to this change.

Why do this change?

1. As PIAs such as BitUSD and BitCNY are getting more widely used, we need to encourage shorters to supply more PIAs.
2. Cost for updating margin position is not high.

the poll is for the whole community and will last 5 days.




1072
中文(Chinese) / Re: 一点设想
« on: November 25, 2015, 03:16:19 pm »
引入ETH交易是可行的,只要这个交易品种有市场。如果开通ETH/BITCNY交易对的成本不高,那就赶紧搞起来。
开通IOU交易对没多少成本,但是现在使用成本比较高,一是下单手续费比较贵,二是转账手续费比较高也导致了不方便充值提现。

对于LTM来说还可以,但是现在20000的LTM费用实在太高,真想降到10000去。

1073
General Discussion / Re: my plan to adjust SQP
« on: November 25, 2015, 04:44:13 am »
110% is MSSR, SQP is asset specific,  SQP=settlement price/MSSR, right?

in BM's short  term road map post below item is listed:
1.  Prevent margin call from being triggered unless the price feed is less than call price  (popular demand)
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20214.0.html

if I understand correctly, this change means to adjust the MSSR to 100%.
why not to push BM to implement this?

1074
General Discussion / Re: New Stealth Transfer Worker ($1000)
« on: November 23, 2015, 03:04:00 pm »
the way is ok, I am not sure about the price, please devs advice.

and $45000 can be funded by 112500 transfers if each transfer contribute $0.4.
suppose 100 stealth transfers each day, need about 3 years to cover...

I hope below change can be implemented with high priority:

1.  Prevent margin call from being triggered unless the price feed is less than call price  (popular demand)

1075
中文(Chinese) / 一点设想
« on: November 23, 2015, 01:58:28 pm »
近来总有种被Bitshares绑架的感觉,明明觉得DEX作为一个去中心化交易所真的很不错,但想干点什么总感觉四面掣肘。

我相信BM也是想推进去中心化的,过去没有相应的机制,就象一个只有总统没有国会的体制,总统只好事事独断专行,有时难免捅娄子。现在好歹有committee 和 worker proposal, 社区有机会通过投票来决定bitshares的走向,虽然还有很长的路要走,但毕竟让人看到了希望。

但是实在是不喜欢推荐人制度,推荐人制度直接导致高收费,但怎么都觉得一个高收费的交易所很难吸引人。但这个制度已经存在了,而且已经形成了一个利益群体,你没法无视它。即便要通过投票逐渐降低交易费,也得降得让这些推荐人商家服气,比如说你比他们拉来更多的新用户,带来更多的流量,而且看起来如果收费能够降低你能拉来更多的用户。。。

需要有更多的BitCNY供应量,需要有更多的交易,需要更多的人进来,需要BTS价格起来。。。

怎么推动这些呢?

我的一点初步想法是:

引入ETH交易,并着力培养ETH/BITCNY交易对。

在三四个月后小蚁完成第二次众筹后,第一时间引入小蚁股交易,并着力培养小蚁股/BITCNY交易对。

中国社区对ETH有需求,但是现在基本只能到P网用比特币交易,对小蚁股有兴趣的人也很不少,相信如果可以会有不少人愿意在DEX里面用BITCNY交易的。

还想搞个机器人,如果钱包里运行了这个机器人,那么谁以这个钱包的账户为推荐人注册的话,钱包自动发给注册账户一定数量的BTS(100?200?),可以限制比如一天10个名额。

各位觉得怎样?给点意见?

1076
General Discussion / Re: Discussing the problems with bitUSD (smart coins)
« on: November 23, 2015, 12:45:59 pm »
Your statements are absolutely correct and have been communicated that way for quite some time .. it's called 'floor or parity' ...
It's not really a "flaw" in the system .. it is how it designed and supposed to be working ..

In order to be safe against falling prices you will always need to have more then 1x collateral ..
The only thing that you can do differently is .. also allow other kinds of assets to be used as collateral ... much like what MAKER is doing with the DAI on ethereum ..

I always considered whether Bitshares can introduce BTC as mgwBTC in NXT and use it as collateral to generate other bitassets such as BitUSD, BitCNY.

1077
General Discussion / Re: Discussing the problems with bitUSD (smart coins)
« on: November 23, 2015, 12:36:34 pm »
as there is no  redeemability, users regard bitUSD as an anti-vulnerability asset, not an currency that has equal value as USD, this lead to all the results.

 

1078
翻译得有点误导性。
对于理事会投票决定调低交易费,BM是表达了他的喜悦的:

调低交易费的最大阻力也不是BM,而是一帮推荐人服务商。

不知道BTS会不会象当初的美国一样,华盛顿打完仗向大陆会议交出了他的权杖,之后国会建立,两党整天撕逼。

调低手续费只是个开始,还会继续调的,怎么调却需要仔细研究,把推荐人服务商们惹毛了来跟你拼命就不好玩了。

有时想想都觉得累,才TM5000万的市值,搞得这么复杂,小蚁再来一次众筹估值多半都要超过它了。。。

熊,我觉得我比BM可怜多了,来安慰安慰我吧。。。 :'(

1079
中文(Chinese) / Re: What are the plans of the Chinese Community?
« on: November 21, 2015, 04:46:31 pm »
I think there's a lack of communication between the Chinese and the rest and would like to address that.

What projects are you currently working on?
What about DACx? Any news? Never heard of them again.
What about cn-members? Same as above. I dont hear about them for quite a while.

Any worker proposals the chinese community is thinking about other than lower fees? Any features you're thinking to implement?

Lately I've been hearing a lot about the chinese community wanting lower fees. Well, what do you plan to do if the fees are lowered? What are your plans? How much liquidity will you provide? Do you have bots ready to do? How will you increase volume? I don't want to see fees lowered because of a whim with no justification. I would like to see a decent argument to convince me why we should lower fees. I want to understand why the chinese community wants to lower fees? I sure hope you already have projects and plans in case the fees are lowered.


Sorry for the post in english. I'm sure someone will understand it or translate it. I just would like to see us communicate more.

we had made BitCNY the most stable fiat pegged asset and built the smooth conversion channel with CNY. can you do the same for BitUSD?
I have planned to do international remittance via BitAssets, But I cannot find a partner that can do convenient BitUSD<->USD conversion, can you make this easy?
alt has run bots in bitshares 1.0, but now because of the high fee, he hesitated to upgrade the bots to 2.0.
DACx is in stop status, Jame Gong is now busy on some other projects which is not relevant to Bitshares. he is not very interested to do more for Bitshares, mainly because of the frequently unexpected sudden rule change.
in China seldom are really interested in the referral program.
I plan to add more assets through transwiser to BTS for trading in the future.

there are too many debate post about fees in the forum, I am tired to read each of them, now we have a working committee whose responsibility is to manage the blockchain parameters, including fees, if you really like high fee, you can try to get enough votes to join the committee to participate in the fee management, or vote one committee who have the same opinion with you.

1080
Smartcoin + high performance exchange,  in my view this is the core competence of Bitshares.

blockchain concept create many possibilities,  for most widespread cryptocurrency Bitcoin maybe the No.1,  for smart contract and DApp Ethereum may be the first choice, however regarding pegged digital assets and decentralized exchange, Bitshares come to user's mind firstly.

each platform should focus on something, to do everything always means nothing can be done best.

Why I am still here?  it's not easy to answer. I think because I feel Bitshares still have potential to play an important role in the blockchain/cryptocurrency  industry,  there are things to be done and worth doing.

and I still haven't made enough money here, I should finish this task.

Pages: 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79